[petsc-users] command line handling in PETSC 3.2, a simple fix for Wheezy?

[Alexei Matveev]

> behavior, thus I think it's acceptable to backport.
>
> Consequently, I've cherry-picked this back onto 'maint-3.2'.
>
>   https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/branch/maint-3.2
>
>
>
Dear Debian Science Maintainers,

Do you think it is possible to apply this change to Petsc Debian
package for Wheezy? I just re-built the package with the fix
applied and the regression is gone.

I guess a similar effect could be achieved by using the most recent
upstream for 3.2 (this would be "old stable" Petsc).

I am not familiar with proper procedure so I attach a "git format-patch"
output for Debian Science petsc repo for the "wheezy" branch.

Alexei

$ mpicc -I/usr/include/petsc a.c -lpetsc
$ ./a.out
without --test option
op1: 1
op2: 2
$ ./a.out  --test
with --test option
op1: 1
op2: 2
$ ./a.out  --test --op1 42
with --test option
op1: 42
op2: 2
$ ./a.out  --test --op1 42 --op2 24
with --test option
op1: 42
op2: 24
$ ./a.out  --op1 42 --test --op2 24
with --test option
op1: 42
op2: 24
$ ./a.out  --op1 42 --op2 24
without --test option
op1: 42
op2: 24
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20130426/f29a9247/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: wheezy-git.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4107 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20130426/f29a9247/attachment-0001.obj>