[petsc-users] command line handling in PETSC 3.2, a simple fix for Wheezy?

[Anton Gladky]

Hi Alexei and Jed,

thanks for triaging and fixing that. I have committed the fix into
package git-repo [1], but it will unlikely be approved by Release-Team,
as it is not a critical. We can try to upload the fix into the backports
after the Wheezy will be released.

One of our team-members has done work on packaging 3.3-version, so that
will probably be soon uploaded as well.

Best regards,

Anton

[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/petsc.git;a=commit;h=6d043c23c3eea30e327543a5189a8602d24467ec

On 04/26/2013 06:12 PM, Alexei Matveev wrote:
> Dear Debian Science Maintainers,
> 
> Do you think it is possible to apply this change to Petsc Debian
> package for Wheezy? I just re-built the package with the fix
> applied and the regression is gone.
> 
> I guess a similar effect could be achieved by using the most recent
> upstream for 3.2 (this would be "old stable" Petsc).
> 
> I am not familiar with proper procedure so I attach a "git format-patch"
> output for Debian Science petsc repo for the "wheezy" branch.
> 
> Alexei


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 897 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20130426/d6489c35/attachment.pgp>