Bug#724920: Bug#725661: pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1

[intrigeri]

Hi,

Cyril Brulebois wrote (07 Oct 2013 08:41:17 GMT) :
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu at debian.org> (2013-10-07):
>> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv.
>> 
>> opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#724920).
>> I want to solve this problem.
>> Source code of the target is the code for test. It does not affect the actual working.
>> 
>> I attached debdiff. Could you consider this change suitable for stable-proposed-updates?

> (for the records, we usually prefer when bugs are fixed in testing /
> unstable before considering updates in stable.) Anyway, if the files
> indeed got relicensed under a suitable license, why should they get
> removed from an earlier release? At best we could ship a package with
> updated headers and licensing info to reflect the facts all those files
> are actually OK?

Ping?

Regards,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc