Bug#724920: Bug#725661: pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1

[Nobuhiro Iwamatsu]

Hi,

Thanks for your ping. And sorry, reply was late.
I am working about this.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro


2014-01-22 intrigeri <intrigeri at debian.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote (07 Oct 2013 08:41:17 GMT) :
>> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu at debian.org> (2013-10-07):
>>> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv.
>>>
>>> opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#724920).
>>> I want to solve this problem.
>>> Source code of the target is the code for test. It does not affect the actual working.
>>>
>>> I attached debdiff. Could you consider this change suitable for stable-proposed-updates?
>
>> (for the records, we usually prefer when bugs are fixed in testing /
>> unstable before considering updates in stable.) Anyway, if the files
>> indeed got relicensed under a suitable license, why should they get
>> removed from an earlier release? At best we could ship a package with
>> updated headers and licensing info to reflect the facts all those files
>> are actually OK?
>
> Ping?
>
> Regards,
> --
>   intrigeri
>   | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
>   | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc



-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6