Boost needs help
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
leo at alaxarxa.net
Thu Mar 13 09:22:36 UTC 2014
A Dijous, 13 de març de 2014, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
> On March 12, 2014 01:56:26 PM Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> > New boost release version (-5) was uploaded fixing the bug 739904
according
> > to the changelog[1].
>
> Yes. Strangely sometime after I sent the "help boost" message to the
mailing
> list, my originally-rejected upload got published. I appreciate that.
>
> However; no-one contacted me to say what changed, so I expect the next
upload
> will face similar issues and the request for help still stands.
Hi Steve,
yes, I realized about that. But I answered your email proposing and asking
some questions that you didn't answered.
One bug just needs a repack with dfsg sufix and deleting/replacing the files.
I cannot send you a patch about this (or don't know how to do it).
The other one, I asked what to do? Just including the sources in the dfsg?
Just adding a note in the debian directory?
Regards,
Leopold
>
>
>
> >
> > [1]
> > http://metadata.ftp-
master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/boost1.54/boost1.54
> > _1.54.0-5_changelog
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
<leo at alaxarxa.net
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > A Dimecres, 5 de març de 2014, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
> > > > On March 3, 2014 09:22:01 AM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > > > > > [1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8731
> > > > > > [2] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84950
> > > > > > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904
> > > > > > [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482372
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Jose,
> > > > >
> > > > > so, when the new package of boost were upload, then we can try to
> > > > > build
> > > > > again and see if it works... I hope so.
> > > >
> > > > The fix for this bug has been made and uploaded.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, the upload was rejected for unrelated bugs. Apparently
> > >
> > > they
> > >
> > > > are "serious" bugs but not the kind I am not motivated to fix. So
> > >
> > > patches
> > > for
> > >
> > > > #735339 and #735353 would be welcome. Please work against
> > > > svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-boost/boost/branches/1.54.0
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I don't know if I'm surprised, thinking if it's Aprils fools or what.
> > > Simply I
> > > don't understand the situation. Anyway, looking the bugs:
> > >
> > > 735339:Non free w3m valid icons
> > >
> > > I think that it could be several solutions. One is repack the source
> > > without
> > > that file. I don't know how to send a patch for this. It's a NMU. Maybe,
> > > we
> > > can change the icon, but ...
> > >
> > > If it's just to change the icon, I can borrow the equivalent icons from
> > > piuparts and change it.
> > >
> > > And the last is create a libboost-nonfree with all this stuff.
> > >
> > >
> > > 735353: Sourceless file
> > >
> > > I have no idea about javascript. Looking the files the are scripts, some
> > > firstly I don't understand the bug. However, I imagine that this
"strange
> > > files" come from some sources, and the file provided is just the exit
from
> > > another script.
> > >
> > > I don't know sufficiently the policies but maybe it could be sufficient
> > > do:
> > > or put a note in the README with the two links from where download the
> > > sources,
> > > or include the two sources in some place of the package.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Leopold
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Linux User 152692
> > > Catalonia
>
--
--
Linux User 152692
Catalonia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20140313/82409307/attachment.sig>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list