Trilinos packages
Nico Schlömer
nico.schloemer at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 11:15:49 UTC 2014
A quick poll on the Trilinos package naming:
Right now, we have "libtrilinos", which triggers a
package-name-doesnt-match-sonames warning since none of the Trilinos
libraries is called libtrilinos.* (rather libepetra.*, libbelos.*,
...). This is similar to the libboost package which doesn't contain a
library by the name libboost.* either.
On the other hand, a software very similar to Trilinos, PETSc, goes by
the Debian name "petsc".
What would you prefer for a package name: libtrilinos or trilinos
(with its -dev, -doc, -dbg variants, respectively)?
Cheers,
Nico
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Anton Gladky <gladk at debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> I have built locally your package. But if you run lintian over
> .changes file, it gives a lot of errors and warnings. Please,
> deal with them.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Anton
>
>
> 2014-03-10 16:35 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer at gmail.com>:
>
>> > Did you repack it?
>>
>> Nope. For creating the printine-tar branch, I used the
>> --git-pristine-tar option as described on
>> https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit#pristine-tar.
>>
>> --Nico
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Anton Gladky <gladk at debian.org> wrote:
>> > 2014-03-10 16:25 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> > It seems, the checksum of tarball on the website and
>> >> > in pristine-tar branch is not the same.
>> >>
>> >> So what to do about this?
>> >
>> >
>> > Did you repack it?
>> >
>> > Anton
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list