Bug#766290: luasseq: please make documentation available to texdoc

[Rupert Swarbrick]

Hi there,

I agree that there's no point maintaining two packages with the same
contents :-) I've just installed texlive-luasseq to check and, yep,
these are definitely the same. Was luasseq (2) added to texlive-luatex
vaguely recently? I'm reasonably sure the code wasn't packaged when I
made the package in the first place (or, at least, I hope it wasn't...)

Anyway, it also seems a little silly to have the spectral sequence code
in luasseq sitting out on its own for no good reason, so I vote for
replacing luasseq with the transitional package.

I don't know much about this process, and I'm not a DD, so I suspect
that I'll be spectacularly inefficient at making it happen. If it's a 10
minute job for you, please feel free to make an upload that turns
luasseq into a transitional package. If it's more work, let me know and
I'll roll up the required package (and maybe you could sponsor the
upload that would be needed afterwards?)

Finally, sorry for the slightly slow reply. I'll be quicker off the mark
From now: would be very embarrassing to end up missing the Jessie freeze
date!


Rupert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 298 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20141029/da4d8c8d/attachment-0003.sig>