Bug#791280: simbody: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

[Mehdi Dogguy]

On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:14:13PM +0000, Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org> wrote:
>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>    against these packages.
> 

This packages doesn't have any reverse dependencies, AFAICS. So, renaming
binary packages doesn't seem necessary.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy