Bug#791280: simbody: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

[Scott Kitterman]

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 02:33:26 +0200 Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi at dogguy.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:14:13PM +0000, Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org> 
wrote:
> >  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
> >    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
> >    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
> >    against these packages.
> > 
> 
> This packages doesn't have any reverse dependencies, AFAICS. So, renaming
> binary packages doesn't seem necessary.

It does have one rdepend, gazebo.  Patch for update attached (based on the 
Ubuntu patch).

Scott K
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: simbody_3.5.1+dfsg-2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5451 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/attachments/20150829/11341d36/attachment.bin>