debian-science_1.6_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Ole Streicher]

Hi Andreas,

I fixed this in the git; it is enough to change this package later (so
no need to re-upload yet).

Cheers

Ole

On 24.01.2017 17:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Ole,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:30:12PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>
>> This is just a typo: a "-" is missing between virtual and observatory.
>>
>> https://packages.debian.org/unstable/astro-virtual-observatory
> 
> I should have waited with the additional upload probably ...  However,
> no real harm is done since we will upload before the final release
> another set of metapackages.  I think its better not to touch the
> packages in the new queue right now.
> 
> If you disagree feel free to ask for rejection again and lets upload
> a fix.
> 
>>> I admit I'd prefer if you would not hardcode this task but
>>> rather would use the established mechanism to verify the existence of
>>> packages before adding the strict dependency.  Do you have any good
>>> reason to derive from this?
>>
>> They are hardcoded because I want to phase out the astronomy and
>> astronomy-dev tasks in debian-science in favour of the Debian Astro Pure
>> Blend. Existing users shall be redirected to the new tasks, but the old
>> ones shall be marked as such. This needs to have them in "oldlibs", and
>> with hard dependencies to the new tasks. Once Stretch is out, they
>> should just be removed.
> 
> OK.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>     Andreas.
>