Comments regarding tpot_0.11.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

[Christian Kastner]

On 27.03.20 23:15, Sean Whitton wrote:
> - can you confirm that images/tpot-logo.jpg is in its preferred form
>   for modification, i.e., the Adobe Illustrator source file has been
>   lost to the mists of time?

I wasn't aware that the image was created in Adobe Illustrator, but I
don't believe that upstream would have lost it.

While I figure this out with upstream (which may take time), would it be
OK if I upload a +dfsg2 with the logo removed? It's anything but vital
to the doc package.

> - is the doc binary package name correct?  I would have expected to
>   see tpot-doc.

It's a common pattern for Python module doc packages to be named after
the binary module package, eg:
  * src:scipy -> python3-scipy, python-scipy-doc
  * src:numpy -> python3-numpy, python-numpy-doc

$ apt-cache search 'python-.*-doc' | wc -l
652

I found the practice of keeping the python- prefix for the -doc package
odd (instead of switching to python3-), but I the Python2 removal page
[1] states that a rename should not happen.

However, as I just realized, this is not a rename, but a new upload.
I'll ask debian-python, just to be sure.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal