Comments regarding tpot_0.11.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

[Sean Whitton]

Hello Christian,

On Sat 28 Mar 2020 at 11:19AM +01, Christian Kastner wrote:

> On 27.03.20 23:15, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> - can you confirm that images/tpot-logo.jpg is in its preferred form
>>   for modification, i.e., the Adobe Illustrator source file has been
>>   lost to the mists of time?
>
> I wasn't aware that the image was created in Adobe Illustrator, but I
> don't believe that upstream would have lost it.
>
> While I figure this out with upstream (which may take time), would it be
> OK if I upload a +dfsg2 with the logo removed? It's anything but vital
> to the doc package.

Certainly.

>> - is the doc binary package name correct?  I would have expected to
>>   see tpot-doc.
>
> It's a common pattern for Python module doc packages to be named after
> the binary module package, eg:
>   * src:scipy -> python3-scipy, python-scipy-doc
>   * src:numpy -> python3-numpy, python-numpy-doc
>
> $ apt-cache search 'python-.*-doc' | wc -l
> 652
>
> I found the practice of keeping the python- prefix for the -doc package
> odd (instead of switching to python3-), but I the Python2 removal page
> [1] states that a rename should not happen.
>
> However, as I just realized, this is not a rename, but a new upload.
> I'll ask debian-python, just to be sure.
>
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal

I'm happy to take your word for it -- just wanted to ask :)

-- 
Sean Whitton