Bug#946451: spyder: work on new upstream release
Julian Gilbey
jdg at debian.org
Sun Jan 3 23:22:03 GMT 2021
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 08:58:26AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2021-01-04 00:38, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> ...
> > I still can't run Spyder and I don't know why not. But I have
> > built all of the dependencies and they are all on salsa; I haven't yet
> > submitted ITPs for them but they are all ready to go. (I also haven't
> > checked whether anyone else has already done so, except for the
> > repository that already existed in the Python teams project salsa.)
> > Should I submit ITPs and upload what I have done so far?
>
> Hi Julian, that would be fantastic if you could help get spyder back in
> order. I've been busy wrangling the computational packages and haven't had
> time to sort through the spyder dependencies. (I don't use spyder directly
> myself, but I appreciate the role it plays helping people work with python).
>
> Please do go ahead with ITPs and uploads. I'll help with ongoing maintenance
> as the upgrades come up, but I'd rather not be primary Maintainer.
>
> ...
> > python-jsonrpc-server (python3-pyls-jsonrpc) - already has ITP #964497
>
>
> Pablo has been patient with us for getting this one uploaded. Let's get this
> done today.
>
> Drew
Hi Drew,
Thanks!
I'll do the three ITP pending packages and start filing the ITPs
within the next two days, all being well.
And I have very good news! I discovered that upgrading
python3-qtawesome allows Spyder to run! There are almost certainly
bugs, as jedi and parso have both had breaking changes, but at least
it runs ;-)
Best wishes,
Julian
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list