How do you feel about gensim losing i386 and armhf?

[Santiago Vila]

On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 02:24:33PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:

> I see that gensim depends on POT [1]. Due to #1149311 [2], I'm
> considering stopping building POT for armhf and i386. How would you as
> gensim maintainers and recent-ish uploaders feel about that?

Hi. I was just an accidental uploader of gensim, and I don't have a
strong attachment to the package itself, but your rationale for
dropping support for 32 bits in a package where upstream already
declared not to be interested makes full sense to me.

Thanks.