How do you feel about gensim losing i386 and armhf?
Andreas Tille
tille at debian.org
Fri Oct 2 17:29:16 BST 2026
I'm in big favour of Build-Depending more or less any scientific package from
architecture-is-64-bit
Its just a burden to ask for removals of the 32bit binaries manually.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 03:08:27PM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 02:24:33PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>
> > I see that gensim depends on POT [1]. Due to #1149311 [2], I'm
> > considering stopping building POT for armhf and i386. How would you as
> > gensim maintainers and recent-ish uploaders feel about that?
>
> Hi. I was just an accidental uploader of gensim, and I don't have a
> strong attachment to the package itself, but your rationale for
> dropping support for 32 bits in a package where upstream already
> declared not to be interested makes full sense to me.
>
> Thanks.
>
--
https://fam-tille.de
More information about the debian-science-maintainers
mailing list