[Debian-science-sagemath] Sage 8.0

[François Bissey]

Looks like 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23134#comment:5
if you are using 8.0.beta11, it means that #23199 didn’t fix it.

François

> On 17/06/2017, at 23:13, Tobias Hansen <thansen at debian.org> wrote:
> 
> With all the new packages in order the only major problem now is a
> segfault during the doc build:
> 
> [dochtml] Done building the documentation!
> [dochtml]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [dochtml]
> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cysignals/signals.x86_64-linux-gnu.so(+0x4e77)[0x7fb1c8788e77]
> [dochtml]
> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cysignals/signals.x86_64-linux-gnu.so(+0x5a05)[0x7fb1c8789a05]
> [dochtml]
> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cysignals/signals.x86_64-linux-gnu.so(+0x8057)[0x7fb1c878c057]
> [dochtml] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x110c0)[0x7fb1cdf3e0c0]
> [dochtml] python(PyErr_Fetch+0xa)[0x55fbc80988da]
> [dochtml]
> /home/thansen/src/sage/sagemath/sagemath/debian/build/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element_quadratic.so(+0x8a0f)[0x7fb0b5a36a0f]
> [dochtml]
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpynac.so.13(+0x169451)[0x7fb09bb3f451]
> [dochtml] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x35910)[0x7fb1cd29e910]
> [dochtml] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x3596a)[0x7fb1cd29e96a]
> [dochtml]
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf8)[0x7fb1cd2892b8]
> [dochtml] python(_start+0x2a)[0x55fbc806031a]
> [dochtml]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [dochtml] Attaching gdb to process id 6055.
> [dochtml]
> [dochtml] Saved trace to
> /home/thansen/src/sage/sagemath/sagemath/debian/test/crash_logs/crash_tq1JYo.log
> [dochtml]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [dochtml] Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault occurred.
> [dochtml] This probably occurred because a *compiled* module has a bug
> [dochtml] in it and is not properly wrapped with sig_on(), sig_off().
> [dochtml] Python will now terminate.
> 
> The crash log file is empty.
> 
> Nothing segfaults during doctesting though:
> 
> sage -t --long src/sage/plot/plot.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 6 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/gosper-sum.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/plot/arrow.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/functions/orthogonal_polys.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/libs/pynac/pynac.pxd  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/optimize.py  # 5 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/libs/pari/tests.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/probability/probability_distribution.pyx  # 1
> doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/backend_cdd.py  # 1 doctest
> failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/repl/rich_output/backend_ipython.py  # 1 doctest
> failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cython.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage_setup/find.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sagenb/notebook/misc.py 
> # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx  # 1 doctest
> failed
> 
> Best,
> Tobias
> 
> On 06/16/2017 08:37 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> 
>> I have just pushed the update to Alioth as experimental package.
>> Once fplll-5.1.0-1 reaches experimental, I will upload it.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jerome
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
> Debian-science-sagemath at lists.alioth.debian.org
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath