[Debian-science-sagemath] fpylll: dependency or dependencee of Sage ?

[Tobias Hansen]

Of course sagelib will get it's own python module packages etc. But are
you saying we should have two distinct source packages? (Because these
are the entities that are built at different times.) That doesn't really
make sense, unless Sage moves sagelib to its own code repository.

Best,
Tobias

On 10/17/2016 01:05 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-10-17 13:04, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Jeroen Demeyer:
>>> To be very precise:
>>>
>>> - fpylll has a *build-time* dependency on Sage-the-library
>>>
>>> - Sage-the-distribution has a *run-time* dependency on fpylll
>>>
>>
>> This is nevertheless a circular dependency.
> 
> No, it is not. "Sage-the-library" (sagelib for short) is just one
> component of "Sage-the-distribution" (Sage for short). If you are not
> making a distinction between those two, you are doing something very
> wrong. Within Sage, we want to make this distinction even more profound,
> see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21507
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-science-sagemath mailing list
> Debian-science-sagemath at lists.alioth.debian.org
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-sagemath