[Debichem-devel] making debichem Maintainer

Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.spam at gmx.net
Sat Aug 18 11:49:29 UTC 2007

Am Samstag, den 18.08.2007, 12:35 +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:
> OK, one more:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:20:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > <buxy> azeem: greylisting / spamassassin / clamav, the usual stuff but
> > 	there's still spam going through
> There's a good blog post by eddyp on how the Debian Games team got rid
> of spam:
> http://ramblingfoo.blogspot.com/2007/08/how-did-debian-games-team-got-rid-of.html
> The most interesting point in this discussion is this:
> * anything that came from the BTS (there are some nice headers that the
>   BTS puts) and was evaluated as ham with a score of 0 (there is a field
>   for that, too - some field has Spam=No, Score=...) was allowed
> * anything that came from the BTS that was Spam=No with a score above 0
>   was held for moderation
> We should probably experiment a bit with that, but all in all, I think
> it should be safe to have a list as Maintainer.  Daniel, do you have any
> further objections?

No. My only concern is the spam issue. I don't want to get an archive
full of spam, that is unreadable. We can (and should) of course give the
solutions you posted a try.

Regards, Daniel

More information about the Debichem-devel mailing list