[Debichem-devel] making debichem Maintainer
Michael Banck
mbanck at debian.org
Sat Aug 18 10:35:46 UTC 2007
OK, one more:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:20:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> <buxy> azeem: greylisting / spamassassin / clamav, the usual stuff but
> there's still spam going through
There's a good blog post by eddyp on how the Debian Games team got rid
of spam:
http://ramblingfoo.blogspot.com/2007/08/how-did-debian-games-team-got-rid-of.html
The most interesting point in this discussion is this:
* anything that came from the BTS (there are some nice headers that the
BTS puts) and was evaluated as ham with a score of 0 (there is a field
for that, too - some field has Spam=No, Score=...) was allowed
* anything that came from the BTS that was Spam=No with a score above 0
was held for moderation
We should probably experiment a bit with that, but all in all, I think
it should be safe to have a list as Maintainer. Daniel, do you have any
further objections?
Michael
More information about the Debichem-devel
mailing list