[Debichem-devel] [Debichem-commits] r612 - in /unstable/openbabel/debian: changelog patches/python_setup_fix.patch

[Jordan Mantha]

On Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 08:39:59PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:21:29AM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> > On Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 02:53:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:26:52PM -0000, mbanck at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> > > >   * debian/patches/python_setup_fix.patch: New patch, make sure the right
> > > >     directories are included in order to find libopenbabel.
> > > 
> > > OK, openbabel builds fine now, and we got a python-openbabel package.
> > > I'm not sure about the python bindings though - apparently there are two
> > > different ones, do we want to ship both or concentrate on one?
> > 
> > Is there one that openbabel seems to recommend? I'm having a hard time finding the
> > python module. I see on http://openbabel.sourceforge.net/wiki/Install a python module
> > for Windows. Or is the python bindings actually in the OpenBabel tarball? I've got
> > nothing to add but confusion :-)
> 
> Yeah, they are apparently in the tarball, though I thought that there
> was an external (second) python bindings available.  Maybe that one got
> merged into openbabel proper though.
> 
> http://openbabel.sourceforge.net/wiki/Python talks about the openbabel
> and pybel modules, both seem to be included in the tarball:
> 
> ./usr/share/python-support/python-openbabel/pybel.py
> ./usr/share/python-support/python-openbabel/openbabel.py

My guess is that's sufficient for now at least.
 
> I don't have a Windows machine to see what those .exe mentioned in the
> wiki/Install contain.

Same here.
 
> On the other hand, we can probably remove/add one or the other python
> module later on, it might be more important to get OpenBabel-2.1.1 into
> unstable.

I agree.

-Jordan