[Debichem-devel] [Debichem-commits] r612 - in /unstable/openbabel/debian: changelog patches/python_setup_fix.patch

[Daniel Leidert]

Am Freitag, den 20.07.2007, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:

[..]
> Hrm, another worry: In principle, I am not against shipping libinchi
> >from the openbabel source package, but long-term I hope inchi will get
> its own source package and all.
> 
> Now, the current package is libinchi0_2.1.1-1, and I'm worried that this
> calls for an immediate epoch as soon as inchi releases on its own.
> 
> Alternative would be linking statically to libinchi inside openbabel and
> ignoring it for now (which we've done for openbabel-2.0 I think).

I would use an epoch, when it becomes necessary. This is IMHO the
natural way. Is there anything bad with epochs?

Regards, Daniel