[Debichem-devel] Cron <dleidert-guest at alioth> $PERL5LIB/pet -c $QA_BASE/debichem/PET/pet.conf --showall
Michael Banck
mbanck at debian.org
Sun Apr 19 00:56:21 UTC 2009
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 05:29:58PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Cron Daemon <root at alioth.debian.org> wrote:
> > pymol: Molecular Graphics System
> > - Problems: has_bugs, upstream_ancient
> > - Notes: 1.1 > 1.0r2
> > + Latest version: 1.1-1 (from unstable)
> > - Upstream status: upstream_ancient
> > + URL: http://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pymol/tags/1.0r2/
> > + Latest version: 1.0r2
>
> Where does the tarball for this come from? I couldn't find a 1.1 tag
> in SVN. Do we use a registration-enabled download?
No, I am not sure there are tags at all, either; however, the pymol
website usually mentions the subversion revision a particular release is
synonymous with.
Yeah, it's a PITA...
> > xdrawchem: Chemical structures and reactions editor
> > - BTS status: has_bugs
> > + Bug #379391 - xdrawchem: segfault when "save as"
> > + Bug #405131 - Export filter for binary CDX format exports to CDXML
> > + Bug #215409 - xdrawchem: segfaults on weird smiles input
> > + Bug #482934 - xdrawchem: please update to the new menu structure
> > + Bug #245051 - xdrawchem: xfig export for wdrawchem ?
> > + Bug #464921 - xdrawchem: Build depends on ancient libqt3-compat-headers
>
> The last release was in 2005. The last email to either the announce or
> users list was in 2006. Should we at some point think about getting
> rid of xdrawchem?
Yes. It's the only 2D structure editor for Qt I know, though. However,
people who like Qt probably don't like how xdrawchem uses it, so...
Removal can maybe wait for another couple of months, but if the
situation does not improve, should definetely happen for squeeze.
Michael
More information about the Debichem-devel
mailing list