[Debichem-devel] jgromacs package seems useful

Steffen Möller steffen_moeller at gmx.de
Thu May 17 12:15:06 UTC 2012

On 05/17/2012 02:11 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb "Steffen Möller":
> [..]
>>>> One thing about README.source; I think if you do something fancy with
>>>> the original tarball, it would be best to supply a "get-orig-source"
>>>> script for the modifications.
>> Right. This is why I had time to address the packaging and you had not :o)
> [..]
>>>> I take you based you packaging on "jgromacs_v1_src.tgz"?
>> Yes.
>>>> I just renamed the "source" directory inside the jgromacs tarball to
>>>> "jgromacs-1.0" here so far, and it build fine.  
>>>> You wrote you removed jama, I think it is fine to keep it even if it is
>>>> not used in the build.  Unless we have to remove it due to some
>>>> licensing issues, which I guess is not the case?
>> Hm. The debian/copyright file would need to be amended. IIRC correctly
>> then my build instructions only take code from the jgromacs subfolder,
>> i.e. the extra eyeballs on the Jama library remain established. That
>> is the only bit that is important to me, really. Leave it in if you
>> prefer, even though I had done that fancy GZIP=-9n while retaring.
> Hi guys. I added a script to create the tarball and made some other
> changes, which I thought should be done.


Many thanks and regards


More information about the Debichem-devel mailing list