[Debichem-devel] jgromacs package seems useful

[Daniel Leidert]

Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb "Steffen Möller":

[..]
> > > One thing about README.source; I think if you do something fancy with
> > > the original tarball, it would be best to supply a "get-orig-source"
> > > script for the modifications.
> 
> Right. This is why I had time to address the packaging and you had not :o)
[..]
> > > I take you based you packaging on "jgromacs_v1_src.tgz"?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > > I just renamed the "source" directory inside the jgromacs tarball to
> > > "jgromacs-1.0" here so far, and it build fine.  
> > > 
> > > You wrote you removed jama, I think it is fine to keep it even if it is
> > > not used in the build.  Unless we have to remove it due to some
> > > licensing issues, which I guess is not the case?
> 
> Hm. The debian/copyright file would need to be amended. IIRC correctly
> then my build instructions only take code from the jgromacs subfolder,
> i.e. the extra eyeballs on the Jama library remain established. That
> is the only bit that is important to me, really. Leave it in if you
> prefer, even though I had done that fancy GZIP=-9n while retaring.

Hi guys. I added a script to create the tarball and made some other
changes, which I thought should be done.

Regards, Daniel