[Debichem-devel] Gromacs migration to Git (Was: What about SVN to Git migration)

[Andreas Tille]

Hi again,

I'll take the "no particularly strong opinions" as a "go for it".

My question how to deal with beta versions in d/watch remains: I
*personally* would exclude beta versions from our observation, but I do
not know upstream release policy sufficiently enough to decide this
myself.  The fact that upstream seemd to have a good contact to the
DebiChem packaging team and informs explicitly about beta versions that
are worth packaging is IMHO strengthening my suggestion to drop beta
from watch file since we will be informed by "other means" about
distributable betas.

Please let me know what you think.

BTW, I would import the said beta version into Git repository and
leave you a final view before uploading.  Is this OK for you?

Kind regards

       Andreas.


On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:01:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:56:35AM -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 07:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Nicholas, ping - what do you think about SVN -> Git migration of
> > > gromacs?
> > 
> > I have no particularly strong opinions.  I've been happy leaving it on SVN
> > while it remains an option simply because I'm more familiar with it, but which
> > particular VCS is used is not a significant concern.
> 
> While there were people who expressed some **hope** that **somehow** SVN
> will remain possible after the Alioth move **somehow** I have never read
> about a volunteer who has the time and hardware to realise this hope.
> So my strong advise is to move from SVN to Git with high priority since
> any migration process takes longer than expected.  The Debian Med team
> is closed to finished and I feel pretty save that we will manage to
> finalise this until end of the year.  But it is not really time to think
> about this.  Either you know somebody who **guarantees** that SVN
> remains possible and this will be proven in an Alioth-SVN to
> SOME_ALTERNATIVE-SVN soon or you should migrate to Git.
>  
> > The 2018~beta1 upstream release should not be uploaded, however.  It's a very
> > early beta and not suitable for packaging yet, even in experimental.
> 
> What about ignoring "~beta\d" versions in watch file to not get this kind
> of false alarms about new upstream versions?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>        Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Debichem-devel mailing list
> Debichem-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debichem-devel
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de