[Debichem-devel] Not yet categorised packages of Debichem team
Michael Banck
mbanck at debian.org
Fri Mar 17 20:30:34 UTC 2017
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:57:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I regularly run a script[1] to verify that all packages maintained by a
> Blends team are categorised in the tasks of the Blend. Currently the
> result is the following:
>
> source | bin | changed_by
> -------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
> cclib-data | cclib-data | Debichem Team <debichem-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> comet-ms | comet-ms, comet-ms-dbg | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> ga | libglobalarrays-dev | Graham Inggs <ginggs at debian.org>
> garlic-doc | garlic-doc | Michael Banck <mbanck at debian.org>
> gelemental | gelemental, libelemental0, libelemental-dev, libelemental-doc | Graham Inggs <ginggs at debian.org>
> gpaw-setups | gpaw-data | Graham Inggs <ginggs at debian.org>
> jgromacs | libjgromacs-java, libjgromacs-java-doc | Steffen Moeller <moeller at debian.org>
> libghemical | libghemical-dev, libghemical5v5, libghemical-data | Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org>
> libmstoolkit | libmstoolkit-dev, libmstoolkit77, libmstoolkit77-dbg | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> liboglappth | liboglappth-dev, liboglappth2 | Daniel Leidert (dale) <daniel.leidert at wgdd.de>
> libwildmagic | libwildmagic-dev, libwildmagic5, libwildmagic5-dbg, libwildmagic-common, libwildmagic-examples | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> python-pymzml | python-pymzml, python3-pymzml, python-pymzml-doc | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> r-cran-base64enc | r-cran-base64enc | Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>
> r-cran-downloader | r-cran-downloader | Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>
> votca-tools | libvotca-tools-dev, libvotca-tools3 | Michael Banck <mbanck at debian.org>
>
> I'd recommend to add these packages either to the DebiChem tasks or just
> tell me that this does not make sense and should be whitelisted in [1].
Quite a few of those are -data, -doc, or lib* packages, shouldn"t thoose
be whitelisted by default?
Michael
More information about the Debichem-devel
mailing list