[Debichem-devel] Not yet categorised packages of Debichem team

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Michael,

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 09:30:34PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:57:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I regularly run a script[1] to verify that all packages maintained by a
> > Blends team are categorised in the tasks of the Blend.  Currently the
> > result is the following:
> > 
> >       source       |                                              bin                                               |                       changed_by
> > -------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
> >  cclib-data        | cclib-data                                                                                     | Debichem Team <debichem-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> >  comet-ms          | comet-ms, comet-ms-dbg                                                                         | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> >  ga                | libglobalarrays-dev                                                                            | Graham Inggs <ginggs at debian.org>
> >  garlic-doc        | garlic-doc                                                                                     | Michael Banck <mbanck at debian.org>
> >  gelemental        | gelemental, libelemental0, libelemental-dev, libelemental-doc                                  | Graham Inggs <ginggs at debian.org>
> >  gpaw-setups       | gpaw-data                                                                                      | Graham Inggs <ginggs at debian.org>
> >  jgromacs          | libjgromacs-java, libjgromacs-java-doc                                                         | Steffen Moeller <moeller at debian.org>
> >  libghemical       | libghemical-dev, libghemical5v5, libghemical-data                                              | Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org>
> >  libmstoolkit      | libmstoolkit-dev, libmstoolkit77, libmstoolkit77-dbg                                           | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> >  liboglappth       | liboglappth-dev, liboglappth2                                                                  | Daniel Leidert (dale) <daniel.leidert at wgdd.de>
> >  libwildmagic      | libwildmagic-dev, libwildmagic5, libwildmagic5-dbg, libwildmagic-common, libwildmagic-examples | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> >  python-pymzml     | python-pymzml, python3-pymzml, python-pymzml-doc                                               | Filippo Rusconi <lopippo at debian.org>
> >  r-cran-base64enc  | r-cran-base64enc                                                                               | Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>
> >  r-cran-downloader | r-cran-downloader                                                                              | Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org>
> >  votca-tools       | libvotca-tools-dev, libvotca-tools3                                                            | Michael Banck <mbanck at debian.org>
> > 
> > I'd recommend to add these packages either to the DebiChem tasks or just
> > tell me that this does not make sense and should be whitelisted in [1].
> 
> Quite a few of those are -data, -doc, or lib* packages, shouldn"t thoose
> be whitelisted by default?

There is no such thing as "default" in my very simple test script.  I've
commited 


$ git diff
diff --git a/misc/sql/0-uncategorised.sh b/misc/sql/0-uncategorised.sh
index c495148..1256a35 100755
--- a/misc/sql/0-uncategorised.sh
+++ b/misc/sql/0-uncategorised.sh
@@ -111,7 +111,9 @@ case "$1" in
         ;;
     debichem)
         team="'debichem-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org'"
-        ignore="'r-other-iwrlar'"
+        ignore="'cclib-data',
+                'garlic-doc',
+                'r-other-iwrlar'"
         ;;
     *)
         echo "Unsupported Blend $1"

For the other packages it is sufficient to add only *one* binary package
to any of the tasks to make the whole set produced from the source
package is not showing up on the list.  I agree that -data, -doc and lib*
should not be listed but *-tools should be listed and IMHO also *-dev.

Kind regards

     Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de