[Freedombox-discuss] Working Groups

[James Vasile]

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:32:29 -0400, Boaz <alt.boaz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Standard disclaimer: non-developer's thoughts follow.
> 
> >The idea of working groups has been proposed a few times by a few
> >different people.  From my point of view, this seems like a good idea.
> >It's time.
> >
> >There are two questions here.  First, what working groups should we
> >form.  Second, how shall those groups operate?  I think if we answer the
> >first, each group can answer the second on its own.  I'm happy to
> >arrange hosted infrastructure to the extent debian.org or github don't
> >suit.
> >
> >We've had many suggestions for which working groups to form.  Let's
> >gather them in this thread, choose a minimal starting set and see if we
> >can define and populate them.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >James
> 
> I think that "anything link layer" is a pretty natural choice for a
> subgroup and its own list.  That way the mesh people can work in a
> dedicated space.  No?

Could you define "anything link layer" a little?  I understand what you
mean, but if we're spinning off lists, maybe we want to do that with
some precision to avoid false starts.