[Freedombox-discuss] http://politics.slashdot.org/story/11/07/18/0153204/Security-Consultants-Wa rn-About-PROTECT-IP-Act
ya knygar
knygar at gmail.com
Mon Jul 18 22:45:30 UTC 2011
i'll not mention the possible need for ERP again:)
what i know - there are, definitely, a lot of existing projects in various
states, i think - making from what's already in Debian reps is controversial
desicion, however - why not if world needs FBox v.0 really soon.
PS: i think - so many useful propositions and so less - actual work
is now - only due to existence of closed for participation - - TAC list,
or, more correctly - due to lack of understanding of infrastructure,
it's politics,
lack of real-time and transparent command decisions in community.
Such an authoritarian (at least - it looks like, i know it could be called
a kind of https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Meritocracy ,
but if so - there won't be a closed TAC list, as there are much more
professionals around, i guess)
society for such a pro-freedom project, aren't, obviously,
showing a good results.
That's why i repeatedly propose - a Voting system,
and for have something to vote on there should be
the list with propositions,
maybe - http://www.limesurvey.org could be enough.
maybe - something like forked https://github.com/mozilla/input.mozilla.org
depending on the scale.
I think - even for forming the v0 - open voting could help.
More information about the Freedombox-discuss
mailing list