[Freedombox-discuss] http://politics.slashdot.org/story/11/07/18/0153204/Security-Consultants-Wa rn-About-PROTECT-IP-Act

[Bdale Garbee]

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:30:51 -0400, Ted Smith <tedks at riseup.net> wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> Why are people more attracted to
> debating pet solutions to very hard problems that will not be solved on
> a mailing list than to advancing the agenda of the FreedomBox by
> creating stable configurations for existing software to actually
> implement a FreedomBox?

That's a great question.

> I can put an equal part of the
> blame for this on myself, since I haven't done anything towards these
> goals, but it's distressing that in such a high-profile and obviously
> popular project, nobody seems to have taken the low-hanging fruit.

Several of us will have more time than usual to dedicate to work on
FreedomBox over the next 2 weeks thanks to Debcamp/Debconf in Banja
Luka, which I'm in transit to now.

Keep an eye on the #freedombox channel on irc.oftc.net to see what we're
up to...

Bdale
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20110718/b460c6e5/attachment.pgp>