[Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox experiment & Sister project
Charles N Wyble
charles at knownelement.com
Wed Jun 15 04:59:17 UTC 2011
On 06/14/2011 10:20 PM, Sébastien Lerique wrote:
> Hello everybody,
Hello. Welcome to the discussion. :)
> Point 1:
> Since the beginning of 2011 I have been working on my own server (now a
> "freedombox playground"), aiming to provide services to friends and
Excellent. https://wiki.mehho.net/Mehho/GettingStarted are the services
you consider stable? Do you have any others planned / in testing? In
I'm curious what social networking software people are playing with. How
much federated interoperability can we start playing with? Are the
packages (appleseed/dispoara etc) stable enough for every day use?
Should we start doing system level testing and see how they interop?
> For more info, see the main page, the development wiki, or
> the description of currently available services. The approach seems
> similar to what Bob Mottram is doing (although for the moment it is
> Ubuntu Server 10.10, on a desktop tower, with 640Go HDD). My current
> goal really is about testing various candidates for services and finding
> what suits best (based on interface, integration, etc.). I haven't
> focused on hardware, or "perfect" security, yet. Just for the info.
Yes this is a good idea. I plan to send an e-mail to the list in a
couple weeks when I've got
finished. Couple sub pages I need to flesh out and more documentation is
needed. I've been running my own services/owning my data for about 18
> Point 2:
> Running that server, it appeared to me that standard DSL link
> reliability is quite an issue.
It certainly can be. Especially the dirt cheap plans offered by the
telco providers in the USA. I paid 110.00 a month for static ip/no
filters/business class DSL in Los Angeles CA. I now run everything on a
VPS at my $dayjob for ~50.00 a month.
> First it can be very unstable, and
> secondly having an asymmetrical bandwidth makes sharing of photos (and
> other potentially large files) quite slow; and of course it can't
> support an occasional slashdotting.
Yeah. Some degree of mitigation is available (rate limiting, caching
etc) but if you get hit with enough bandwidth saturation, you are in
> I think it is an important problem
> -- I wouldn't want my blog or social networking account to be off-line
> every now and then. A solution I see to it, though maybe partial, would
> be taking advantage of the fact that many boxes would be in that same
> situation, and developing a way to distribute service-providing between
> boxes owned by friends (some sort of mix between P2P and CDN). At this
> point it is still very vague.
I agree 100%. Would love to see a fully user owned/operated CDN. That
would be awesome.
Very cool stuff. Please keep us informed.
I'm busy getting my stack fully deployed and documented and will send an
announcement e-mail in a couple of weeks.
More information about the Freedombox-discuss