[Freedombox-discuss] Government use but no government conspiracy
foxmuldrster at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 28 19:50:44 UTC 2012
No, I don't believe I naively believe that vPro and other such technologies are only being used as has been disclosed. That's why I was so scared about the technology when I read about it. I would argue that it would be an absolute impossibility (due to the ease with which one moves from A to B) that it was not moved beyond A (public disclosure of IT abilities) and into B (hidden stuff that governments / military can use).
No, I believe categorically that vPro is the most scary technology ever put into a general purpose computing device. And if AMD has something similar, I'll be switching to VIA CPUs only, instead of a mixture of VIA and AMD CPUs in my machines.
Rick C. Hodgin
--- On Thu, 6/28/12, freebirds at hushmail.com <freebirds at hushmail.com> wrote:
> From: freebirds at hushmail.com <freebirds at hushmail.com>
> Subject: [Freedombox-discuss] Government use but no government conspiracy
> To: freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Date: Thursday, June 28, 2012, 3:45 PM
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Rick Hodgins wrote: "You're reaching to go from the
> existence of
> debug regs and UUIDs to a government conspiracy.
> Evidence is
> I did not write that the government forced Intel and AMD to
> a backdoor by installing Intel AMT, Intel vPRO and AMD DASH.
> I did
> write that they would be accessibly by IT administrators,
> government, hackers, etc.
> Likewise, the government did not force Dell and Lenova to
> Intel vPro and Computrace in their BIOS. I did write that
> could be activated by government, hackers, investigators,
> etc. to
> remotely track the geolocation of computers as well as
> procure photographs and data via keyloggers.
> Antimalware programs do not scan BIOS nor processors. They
> do not
> report AMT, DASH, vPRO and Computrace activity.
> Do you naively believe that Intel's AMT and AMD's DASH are
> used by IT administrators? Do you believe that vPRO and
> are solely used for anti-theft? Majority of users never
> their BIOS. They do not know whether their BIOS has vPRO or
> Computrace. Neither owners manuals, manufacturers' websites
> stores advertise Computrace and attempt to sell an annual
> subscription to Computrace. vPRO and Computrace are
> ARM does not have the equivalent of vPRO or Computrace. At
> not yet. Thus, I am not asking you to ask Marvell if there
> is "anti-
> theft." I am asking you to ask Marvel whether: (1) out
> of band
> monitoring; (2) visible PSN; (3) ARM TrustZone which is
> to TPM and; (4) debugger.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Charset: UTF8
> Version: Hush 3.0
> Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
More information about the Freedombox-discuss