[Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox VoIP/IM/Comms (SIP and Jabber), Jingle Nodes, SIP RELOAD

[Jonathan Wilkes]

>________________________________
> From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho at gmail.com>
>To: freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org 
>Cc: drbob <drbob at lunamutt.com> 
>Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox VoIP/IM/Comms (SIP and Jabber), Jingle Nodes, SIP RELOAD
> 
>
>
>
>
>On 19 September 2012 16:22, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.com.au> wrote:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA256
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 19/09/12 14:32, Ramana Kumar wrote:
>>> This page might be mildly relevant:
>>> http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Skype_Replacement
>>
>>
>>I heard about FSF Europe running a Skype Replacement event on the
>>weekend, testing the different clients against each other.  Their goal
>>is very general, moving people from closed source to Free software
>>
>>FreedomBox has an additional goal: privacy.  This limits some of the
>>options (or requires each option to be scrutinised more carefully).
>>
>>Nonetheless, FreedomBox should work with some of the other solutions.
>> It may be very generous and accept any TLS connection, or it may be
>>more severe and require all signaling to go over TOR, for example.  I
>>plan to document the privacy issues more thoroughly to help decide on
>>these strategies.
>>
>>
>>> And I would be interested to know in how the FreedomBox VOIP tools
>>> compare to using WebRTC, and whether the latter might/should be
>>> supported on FBX.
>>
>>WebRTC is for browser-based audio/video.  FreedomBox could potentially
>>provide a web server with such a page for users on the local LAN to
>>use.  The browser would then be just another type of client.
>>
>>
>>Do you want to add these links into the wiki page?
>>
>
>I believe retroshare now has a VoIP plugin
>
>I'm told there will be a web interface soon


Has Retroshare ever been peer reviewed?

-Jonathan