[Fsf-Debian] [Dev] Comparison with Parabola

Andrei POPESCU andreimpopescu at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 05:04:11 UTC 2012

On Ma, 07 aug 12, 12:45:00, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 05:21 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > However, in the meantime I think it is not helpful at all if you
> > start this whole process by calling Debian names. Please try to
> > bring in constructive criticism, or even better start filling bugs
> > against the relevant (pseudo-)packages.
> It isn't "calling names" and I don't need to make propitiations to
> point out grotesque inconsistencies in Debian's message, documents,
> etc etc. Criticism isn't only constructive when its spears miss the
> sacred cows. Skewering those counts, too. In fact they should be the
> very first things against the wall in any serious examination. It gets
> people out of the state of denial around in which they've been wandering.

You still haven't mentioned any bug number...

Kind regards,
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/fsf-collab-discuss/attachments/20120807/3cb3f0a2/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list