[Fsf-Debian] [Dev] Comparison with Parabola
Bryan Baldwin
bryan at katofiad.co.nz
Tue Aug 7 00:45:00 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/07/2012 05:21 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> However, in the meantime I think it is not helpful at all if you
> start this whole process by calling Debian names. Please try to
> bring in constructive criticism, or even better start filling bugs
> against the relevant (pseudo-)packages.
It isn't "calling names" and I don't need to make propitiations to
point out grotesque inconsistencies in Debian's message, documents,
etc etc. Criticism isn't only constructive when its spears miss the
sacred cows. Skewering those counts, too. In fact they should be the
very first things against the wall in any serious examination. It gets
people out of the state of denial around in which they've been wandering.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQIGUMAAoJEM5s7GXJ0FEI2HsH/0U1SVIbDXQd8Ih/1f+gWyKt
Sj2nfEa5xV/JnSWietxWPwcEuGkCt5vdXo7qu1MG9tGDgnxoLI7T6xev7e/XxKVn
mMUji7UKdv//KxgWMOwQihinHcyO2lVZCqIr6DeHtL+P3sIcnjmO6eaB6mldM7ua
fXJBbjrVk+304+qgwLasFetVn2Qss/AWwoqppfpM3FWVfP0/otBc/+PH/NEJ9KlS
BXTQSjwiqqspUP0AnTDnGz/nlp3TmikSVCs339YHbaq01RkoC9hDITyW1NjrQ3N1
9O4AMCzXMmAiYyr6+ie/mmUsrjiiLJWT9F9WzI5B2hjMlnOQ9D8LM/79lmq7+ww=
=M/ny
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Fsf-collab-discuss
mailing list