[Fsf-Debian] GNU Emacs docs (and GCC and others) are not DFSG free
Loic J. Duros
lduros at gnu.org
Mon Jul 9 11:34:45 UTC 2012
The "General Resolution: Why the GNU Free Documentation License is not
suitable for Debian Main"[1] has the following point in the Amendment
Text A:
At the same time, we also consider that works licensed under the GNU
Free Documentation License that include no invariant sections do
fully meet the requirements of the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
Do all the manuals released under the GFDL and present in nonfree have
an invariant clause? Personally, I don't want to enable nonfree just to
get a few info files on Debian, so instead I usually download them from
gnu.org. If no compromise is possible to bring them back to main, maybe
it would be possible to move them from nonfree to elsewhere such as a
new location solely dedicated to documentation released under the GFDL?
This way it would allow people like me to get access to this
documentation without having to open the door to all the rest of nonfree
software.
[1] http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
Thanks,
Loic Duros
lduros at gnu.org
On 07/09/2012 05:04 AM, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> Grant H. wrote:
>> and the ideal goal is: "an agreed upon list of Debian "bugs" that need
>> to be solved, according to the usual Debian mechanisms, and with no
>> special treatment due to their "political" origin."
>>
>> In short this project (as I understand it) is about making debian more
>> free and addressing some of the freedom issues the FSF raises. Not the
>> other way around. We are addressing issues with Debian not with GNU
>> packages/documentation.
>
> This discussion is about bringing Debian and the FSF closer together.
> As the DPL, Stefano talked about what Debian can do. If the outcome of
> this discussion is that the FSF can do something as well, and they'd
> be happy to do it, then why shouldn't they? I'd feel bad if this
> discussion comes down to (or is interpreted as) the FSF making demands
> and Debian doing all the work/compromising to fulfill them.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list
> Fsf-collab-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/fsf-collab-discuss/attachments/20120709/70e2e352/attachment.html>
More information about the Fsf-collab-discuss
mailing list