[Fsf-Debian] GNU Emacs docs (and GCC and others) are not DFSG free

[Sam Geeraerts]

Grant H. wrote:
> and the ideal goal is: "an agreed upon list of Debian "bugs" that need
> to be solved, according to the usual Debian mechanisms, and with no
> special treatment due to their "political" origin."
> 
> In short this project (as I understand it) is about making debian more
> free and addressing some of the freedom issues the FSF raises.  Not the
> other way around.  We are addressing issues with Debian not with GNU
> packages/documentation.

This discussion is about bringing Debian and the FSF closer together. As 
the DPL, Stefano talked about what Debian can do. If the outcome of this 
discussion is that the FSF can do something as well, and they'd be happy 
to do it, then why shouldn't they? I'd feel bad if this discussion comes 
down to (or is interpreted as) the FSF making demands and Debian doing 
all the work/compromising to fulfill them.