[Fsf-Debian] GNU Emacs docs (and GCC and others) are not DFSG free

[Andrei POPESCU]

On Du, 08 iul 12, 20:17:44, Grant H. wrote:
> I don't see how this is actually related to the discussion at hand.
> 
> This list is about the Debian and the GNU project's endorsement.  In
> other words this is about GNU/FSF setting a set of requirements that
> must be met to get an endorsement.  We are discussing what Debian needs
> to do to meet those requirements.
> 
> You are talking about the opposite.  Debian has their own guidelines on
> what to accept based on the DFSG.  GNU documentation based on the GNU
> FDL do not meet the requirements of the DFSG.
> 
> So in short we are talking about how to get Debian to meet the GNU
> projects standards.  We are not talking about how to get GNU stuff to
> meet Debian's standards.

What if in the process we discover that we can get rid of non-free 
completely ;)

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/fsf-collab-discuss/attachments/20120710/5d094d71/attachment.pgp>