[Fusioninventory-devel] about some limits of software inventory
Stéphane Urbanovski
s.urbanovski at ac-nancy-metz.fr
Fri Oct 29 06:57:12 UTC 2010
Le 28/10/2010 10:27, Fabrice Flore-Thebault a écrit :
Hi
[...]
> My opinion is that the most software installed on a host should be
> inventoried, and therefore we should find a way to list dhcpd and pf and all
> software that is installed as a base application on OpenBSD.
>
> I don't know if there is a tool to do it.
This is an OS packaging problem. How *BSD handle a security update on a
"base" component (like pf for example) ? does the wall distribution have
to be updated ?
> In a second time, I think that we should think about doing an inventory of
> some applications that are not to be treated as "software", bus as specific
> sorts of applications : like web applications (apache vhosts, tomcat apps),
> databases. This applications could be then linked to the accurate plugins in
> GLPI.
>
> The idea behind it is that, with such features, the agent could be a tool to
> give a more deep image of an infrastucture during an audit.
+1
We already do that kind of inventory (using the software script hooks).
We add a prefix (JAVAAPPS@ ) on the application name and add some other
infos as key/value in the comment. A cleaner way to do that would be
nice :-)
The problem is nearly the same for databases :
- the software : version, patch ...
- the instance : a db process listening on a port and handling connections
- the database
--
Stéphane Urbanovski
More information about the Fusioninventory-devel
mailing list