Repeated range searches & Including in a project

Paul elegant_dice at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 16 05:11:11 UTC 2012


Hi Rob,

I haven't done anything with libkdtree for a while now.

Have you checked out flann ?
Its got some heavyweights behind it:
http://www.pointclouds.org/

cheers,
Paul

On 3 April 2012 23:00, Rob McDonald <ramcdona at calpoly.edu> wrote:

> I am considering using libkdtree++ for an open source project.  Thank you
> very much for your work and for making this available.  Although the
> mailing list hasn't had traffic since 2010, I'm hoping that someone out
> there is listening.
>
> 1) I need to do many repeated range searches through a static cloud of
> points.  Each search will be at a location very close to the previous
> search.
>
> Is there a way to return the location in the tree from a completed search?
>  Then, can that location be passed to the next search as a starting point?
>  Will this significantly accelerate the search?
>
> 2) What is the preferred way (from the libkdtree developers point of view)
> of including libkdtree++ in a project?  My project is cross-platform, and
> uses CMake to generate build files.
>
> We include some smaller libraries in the project tree directly.  We
> require the developer to go out and obtain other larger libraries as
> required.  This can become a hassle.
>
> I would rather not include everything in our project - the tests/examples,
> the CMake build files, the Python bindings, etc.
>
> I believe we could just include the contents of the kdtree++ directory in
> our project.  What other files would be required by the license? What other
> files would you like to have included?
>
> 3) What is the general status of this library?  Do the developers have any
> further development plans?  Has this reached maturity?  Our project's needs
> are modest, so I think we will be fine with libkdtree++ as-is.  At the same
> time, we haven't committed yet and could switch to another kdtree if that
> is recommended.
>
> We will need a range search, but a radius search would be better (if not
> too expensive).  I saw in the archives some discussion/debate about how
> best to move forward to support a radius search.  Is there any plan for
> that?
>
> Thanks for any information,
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> libkdtree-devel mailing list
> libkdtree-devel at lists.alioth.**debian.org<libkdtree-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.**org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**
> libkdtree-devel<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libkdtree-devel>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/libkdtree-devel/attachments/20120416/f6218d75/attachment.html>


More information about the libkdtree-devel mailing list