Why is runscript always version 1.23?

[Oisin Curtin]

Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:38:39 +0000, Oisin Curtin wrote:
> 
>>Runscript does not implement --version.  It would be great if it did.
> 
>>Is there any reason not to include the correct version and make it
>>available via the --version option?
> 
> Nobody did it so far.

I did.  I've been doing a bit of work in script.c to simplify a job I'm 
doing.  Then yesterday I decided to check if there were any patches to 
script.c beyond the Fedora Core 2 distribution.  Oh CURSES!  I had v 1.4 
and the diff's to version 1.9 are longer than the source!  <sigh>
   I figured out how to get the latest snapshot around midnight last night.


The first thing I'll do is re-do --version in 1.9 and, uh, where should 
I post the patch?


I was going to suggest I post some other changes I did/wanted, but a 
quick glance at v 1.9 shows at least one already done.  I guess I'd 
better test 1.9 before I put my foot in my mouth.


-- 
Oisin  "Whaddya mean `CVS'?  I gots a ess-are-pee-ehm."  Curtin