[Nut-upsdev] Re: apc-hid tests, ups_status updates

Arnaud Quette aquette.dev at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 19:51:45 UTC 2005

2005/10/8, Alfred Ganz <alfred-ganz+nut at agci.com>:
> ...
> Question, is there a reason why the PowerSummary.PresentStatus variables
> Discharging and Charging are not handled in a similar fashion? If not,
> could this be changed?

first, even if your battery is full, and your ups is online, there is a
small amount of power drawn. So having always is CHRG status is normal.
In fact, these complementary status are more interesting for higher end

second, these status need not to be handled like LB, as each one clears the
other. While LB had no pending event (!LB) before...

or did I get you wrong?

Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/
OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20051008/1b8cfc06/attachment.html

More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list