[Nut-upsdev] Re: [resend] Re: [resend] [patch] driver for Eltek

Arnaud Quette aquette.dev at gmail.com
Mon Oct 10 19:12:53 UTC 2005


2005/10/10, Kirill Smelkov <kirr at mns.spb.ru>:
>
> 9 Октябрь 2005 21:43, Peter Selinger написал:
> > Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > > 2. new status: HB = High Battery
> >
> > There should be no such status flag as "High Battery". NUT simply uses
> > the absence of "LB" to indicate this state.
> Ok, maybe you are right.
>
> Although in my ups there are 3 states:
>
> LB -- low battery
> HB -- high battery
> ?? -- normal battery (?? = NB)
>
> Maybe it is worth extending status semantic?



- we already have LB
- normal battery is represented by the absence of LB/RB
- HB should stand for OL+battery.charge=100 isn't it?!

You should better add support for battery.charge. Your ups supports
battery.{current, temperature,...} so it really should support it, and the
status extension is not needed at all.

Arnaud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20051010/778c3734/attachment.html


More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list