[Nut-upsdev] Re: About blazer, powermust and mustek

[Arnaud Quette]

2005/10/23, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
>
> ...
> > attached a patch to change it below.
>
> True. But attaching a suggested CHANGES entry is a great way to
> influence what the commiter commits :-)


for sure, that helps, and more when you have the head away ;-)

> But anyway, a symlink seems like a nice way to provide compatibility,
> > but also poses the question of how many releases to keep it around.
>
> You're right about the development branch, though. For some reason, I
> thought this was going into testing.



As I've stated before, the 2.0.2 and 2.0.3/USB entorse to the stable process
rules are really exceptional! Only some new drivers, like the revived sec
(=> gamatronic) will also go into stable.
The rest will have to wait for 2.2!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20051024/230da543/attachment.htm