[Nut-upsdev] Re: priority of NUT udev rule file [was Fwd: [Nut-upsuser] Powerware 5110]

[Arnaud Quette]

2007/2/6, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
> Arnaud,
>
> Will this cause a problem with the Debian packages if we change it to 052?


not at all, since I put 025 arbitrarily (using the example of
libgphoto2 and libsane)...
but that will have to wait a bit for the official pkg (if you can, log
me a bug for this).

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jon Gough <jon.gough at eclipsesystems.com.au>
> Date: Feb 4, 2007 4:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Powerware 5110
> To: Charles Lepple
> Cc: Steve Simeonidis, nut-upsuser
>
>
>  Charles,
>     Just a quick note that I could not use 025_nut-usbups.rules as it
> came too early in the process. Mine is called 52_nut-usbups so that it
> comes after
>  50-udev.rules  and  51-hotplug.rules
>
>  Regards
>     Jon
>
>
> --
> - Charles Lepple
>


-- 
Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/
OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/