[Nut-upsdev] Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r801 - in

[Peter Selinger]

If you forgot to update and commit the ChangeLog, you can still do
this afterwards (and please do). 

Also make sure you follow the guidelines in docs/developers.txt. 
For example:

* no C++-style comments ("//")
* follow the guidelines on the use of tabs vs. spaces

Thanks, -- Peter

Jon Gough wrote:
> 
> Peter,
>     I have made a small change to the megatec_usb.c file. This is to 
> add endpoint to the usb_ups_t so that it can be specified in the 
> KnownDevices array. I have uploaded it, but I seem to have missed 
> uploading the message area to explain what the change was. I am not 
> use to using SVN on Linux, so it is user error (dumb user syndrom), 
> sorry about that.
> 
>     As far as I can tell, the non-Ablerex UPSs should still work OK 
> as they still get the endpoint number they are expecting.
> 
> Regards
>     Jon
> 
> At 09:55 17/02/2007, Peter Selinger wrote:
> >Alex and co,
> >
> >I have merged the megatec_usb driver to the main trunk, and deleted
> >the branch. The driver is still not complete, but since development
> >does not require too many changes to other NUT files, it may as well
> >be on the trunk.
> >
> >We still need to:
> >
> >* fix the device matching code, so that new users can experiment
> >   without having to write C code,
> >
> >* create a man page for the driver.
> >
> >-- Peter
> >
> >Alexander I. Gordeev wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jon,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:04:07 +0300, Jon Gough 
> > <jon.gough at eclipsesystems.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Peter,
> > > >     Yep, at the moment the Krauler driver works OK for me. So if you
> > > > want to make the change that is fine.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you please test recently added instant commands?
> > > Also it would be great to know how often do you get "UPS No Ack" for
> > > various requests. I'll send you some code to do it...
> > >
> > > On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:06:35 +0300, Jon Gough 
> > <jon.gough at eclipsesystems.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Peter,
> > > >     I am still trying to get more information from the manufacturers,
> > > > but they did send this through to me. I am not going to have time to
> > > > look into it before Tuesday next week. But I thought I should post it
> > > > anyway. My VendorID is -1 rather than 1, but....................
> > > >
> > >
> > > Looks very promising. If I understand right GetFeature/SetFeature
> > > are Windows routines for getting/setting Feature-reports.
> > > We should check if this protocol is working.
> > >
> > > I only wonder, why Windows driver uses different protocol...
> > >
> > > --
> > >    Alexander