[Nut-upsdev] Asking hard questions about the NUT architecture
Eric S. Raymond
esr at thyrsus.com
Wed May 30 02:19:32 UTC 2007
Rob MacGregor <rob.macgregor at gmail.com>:
> However, back in the human world, why shouldn't the admin know that
> the power has gone out and the system is now on battery support?
The UPSes I use normally make *noise* when that happens :-)
> But why should I (or where I work) have to buy a new UPS when the old
> one works just fine?
That keeps coming up. I never said I was after anyone discarding their
hardware. Use old hardware, use an old NUT version. Or, more likely,
use the big clanking complicated steam-powered upper layer and drivers,
unlike the 99% of users who are using the zippy new zero-configuration
spin of the code.
> That'll be that Linux centric view again - FreeBSD doesn't support
> SIGPWR (and, if I'm honest, it's USB support is still relatively
> immature comparted to Linux), but it works just fine as a NUT master.
What does BSD use as a power-fail signal, then?
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
More information about the Nut-upsdev
mailing list