[Nut-upsdev] nut + usb + udev with kernel 2.6.22

[Arjen de Korte]

Gilad Arnold wrote:

> I agree with both arguments. Perhaps an unguarded GOTO is the cleanest
> solution?
> 
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device", GOTO="nut-usbups_rules_real"
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", GOTO="nut-usbups_rules_real"
> GOTO="nut-usbups_rules_end"

Well, I suppose Arnaud had a reason to include the BUS here, so just
stripping this doesn't seem to be the right thing to do. Since it
doesn't hurt to have it, I still don't grasp the reason why it should be
removed.

Best regards, Arjen