[Nut-upsdev] nut + usb + udev with kernel 2.6.22

Arjen de Korte nut+devel at de-korte.org
Mon Oct 8 18:54:17 UTC 2007

Gilad Arnold wrote:

> I agree with both arguments. Perhaps an unguarded GOTO is the cleanest
> solution?
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device", GOTO="nut-usbups_rules_real"
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", GOTO="nut-usbups_rules_real"
> GOTO="nut-usbups_rules_end"

Well, I suppose Arnaud had a reason to include the BUS here, so just
stripping this doesn't seem to be the right thing to do. Since it
doesn't hurt to have it, I still don't grasp the reason why it should be

Best regards, Arjen

More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list