[Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r1728 - trunk/tools
aquette.dev at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 15:11:57 UTC 2009
2009/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Hey Arjen,
>> 2009/1/15 Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org<nut%2Bdevel at de-korte.org>
>>> Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>:
>>> > Author: adkorte-guest
>>> > Date: Thu Jan 15 11:54:05 2009
>>> > New Revision: 1728
>>> > Log:
>>> > Another stab at this.
>>> > Modified:
>>> > trunk/tools/Makefile.am
>>> And failing miserably... :-(
>>> Can someone more fluent in 'autotoolish' fix this problem? Currently
>>> the BuildBot is broken by update r1718 and I'm really out of ideas on
>>> how to make this work again (other than reverting this patch).
>> this seems due to the script not being listed in the dist rules (like
>> I'll take a deeper look at it and will fix that part...
>> thanks for the other errors catching btw.
> Looking at the commits that came after this, I'm not sure we're
> understanding the cause-and-effect relationship here.
> The part that caused the command-not-found error was that the script was
> not listed in EXTRA_DIST. This was masked by the fact that the code was not
> called during 'make distcheck' until the rule was renamed 'dist-hook'.
> However, on my end, that seemed to cause some problems during the 'make
> distclean' stage because now we have generated .in files, and I'm not sure
> that r1729 <http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset/1729> is quite
> right in that regard.
> I think we probably need to call the script with either $(srcdir)/nut-usbinfo.pl
> or $(distdir)/nut-usbinfo.pl (both of which should work, since the script is
> now included in EXTRA_DIST).
yup, I came to exactly the same conclusion.
I'm going for the distdir approach (commit underway)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nut-upsdev