[Nut-upsdev] about nut revision 1289

Arjen de Korte nut+devel at de-korte.org
Thu Jun 18 10:39:41 UTC 2009

Citeren Alexander Gordeev <lasaine op lvk.cs.msu.su>:

> Well, prettifying strace ouput is good but AFAIK not necessary for the driver
> to work. So I'd actually prefer to sacrifice it but not rewrite the whole
> driver which we will throw away some time. Are there any other reasons to
> keep the delays?

Looking at your previous post, I don't think this is the root of the  
problem. The libusb return codes aren't being handled properly by the  
driver. Other than that, I'm not OK with removing these delays. The  
megatec driver is supporting loads of devices, for some of which this  
delay may actually be needed. I'm not sure if the only reason to add  
this delay was for keeping the strace output readable.

Best regards, Arjen
Please keep list traffic on the list

More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list